Holy Bones!

I'm one of these DaVinci afficionados that the culture pundits appear to think are dim n dumma but I find it a fascinating theory - so much so that since reading the book when it first came out I've also read 'The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail' which was a source book for Dan Brown and also the subject of the recent court case alleging plagiarism, and I'm about to get stuck into 'The Gnostic Gospels'.  Expect some unusual quotes <g>

I went to the cinema to see the DaVinci film on Sunday regardless of the bad reviews it's received from critics.  In my opinion, the film was a drastic oversimplification of the book and lost much thereby, and truth to tell Tom Hank's acting was a bit wooden altho a kinder person might say it was 'restrained'.  Nevertheless I enjoyed it and don't think people should be put off by what they read in the media.

The Booker Prize demonstrates, imo, the value of professional literary judgements :O)